Résumé
Background. SARS-CoV-2 infection can be accompanied by neuromuscular disorders. Rhabdomyolysis and Guillain-Barre syndrome have been described repeatedly. There are case reports of inflammatory myopathies manifesting during COVID-19, presenting as dermatomyositis, polymyositis or immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, with dermatomyositis-like presentations most commonly reported. Larger cases series are from postmortem examinations of COVID-19 patients, where variable inflammatory pathology of the skeletal muscle has been found frequently but without local detection of the actual virus. Thus, autoimmune mechanisms or the systemic interferon response are discussed as causes. We report a case of focal inflammatory myopathy with perimysial pathology of the temporalis muscle occurring with acute, but mild COVID-19. Methods. Case report of clinical observations, cranial MRI, histopathological, and laboratory findings. 3T cranial MRI was performed with gadolinium contrast. Open temporalis muscle biopsy was performed. The sample underwent standard cryohistological studies as well as immunohistochemistry with antibodies against MHC-I and II, CD3, CD4, CD19, CD68, anti-MAC, p62 and MxA. Testing for auto-antibodies was based on immunoblots or ELISA. RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 was run with RNA extracted from cryopreserved muscle. Results. A Caucasian woman in her 60s with no history of autoimmune or muscle complaints developed swelling and pain of the right jaw musculature five days after testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 due to respiratory tract symptoms. In addition, she experienced trismus, but no further neuromuscular complaints. The course of respiratory tract symptoms stayed mild. She had been vaccinated previously with single shot SARS-CoV-2 vector vaccine. Due to persistent swelling and complaints, giant cells arteritis was excluded by unresponsiveness to five days oral steroids and sonography of the temporal artery. Cranial MRI was performed nearly four weeks after the SARS-CoV-2 infection and showed marked swelling and oedema of the temporalis muscle. Its biopsy showed numerous CD68 and acid phosphatase positive cells infiltrating from perimysial perivascular foci towards the endomysium with perimysial damage but little damage of adjacent, perifascicular muscle fibres. Muscle fibres did not react with anti-MHC-II, anti-MAC or -MxA. Capillaries did not react with anti-MAC or -MxA. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not detected in muscle tissue. Serum creatine kinase was not elevated in the subacute phase. Slightly elevated ANA titre led to detection of autoantibodies against proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). No pathological results for other autoantibodies, including myositis-specific antibodies and anti-ds-DNA, were found in blood. Neither were antibodies against hepatitis C and B viruses. Retesting 15 weeks after infection, anti-PCNA immunoblot was still positive, but ELISA did not indicate a pathologic titre. The swelling, myalgia and trismus regressed spontaneously a month after onset, yet the latter still persists at the time of reporting. Conclusion. Our case diverges from the majority of COVID-19 associated my-ositis reports in the unusual location of the focal myositis and the histopathological pattern of predominantly perimysial damage and histiocytic infiltration. It concurs with the literature as no SARS-CoV2 RNA could be detected in the muscle. Anti-PCNA is associated very rarely with myositis. Other associated disorder (systemic lupus erythematosus, chronic viral hepatitis B or C) were not found. Increased levels of autoantibodies are reported in COVID-19 and mostly attributed to loss of self-tolerance during the acute disease phase. Interestingly, the structural protein M of SARS-CoV-2 appears to interact notably with PCNA in infected cells. Still, the causal connection between the myositis and COVID-19 in this case is based on the close temporal association in the absence of alternative, competing explanations from the medical history and findings.